- Calculation and number patterns19 · 47.5%
- Word tasks8 · 20%
- Codes and invented language2 · 5%
- Deduction and relationships5 · 12.5%
- Word and character counting3 · 7.5%
- Spatial folding3 · 7.5%
Civil service exams
Policía Nacional 2022 aptitude test: Básica 38
The Spanish National Police Básica 38 aptitude paper (2022) combines mixed reasoning with code comparison. Find the question count and timing for each part, the task breakdown and what to practise using the archived edition.
Archived edition at a glance
Which paper this guide covers
Cognik identifies this paper as Policía Nacional, Escala Básica, promotion 38 (2022). The associated recruitment call was published in September 2021: a call’s publication year and the paper’s year need not be the same. This is the aptitude paper, separate from the knowledge test.
This guide analyses the reviewed edition in Cognik. Its source is an unofficial reproduction. Counts and timings describe that copy and do not predict a later exam.
How many questions and parts are there?
The reviewed copy contains 90 items in two parts: questions 1–40 and 51–100. Numbers 41–50 are absent from this edition; ending at 100 does not make it a 100-question paper.
| Part | Questions | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed questions (1–40) | 40 | 25 |
| Code comparison (51–100) | 50 | 7 |
Which question types appear?
We grouped each question by its main task and counted it once. This is an editorial classification for planning practice, not an official syllabus or a breakdown of marks. The question numbers let you check each group in the archived edition.
Calculation and number patterns account for 19 of the first 40 items, including four number-series questions. The second part adds 50 code comparisons. Across the full 90-item edition, those comparisons alone make up 55.6% of the questions; that percentage is not a scoring weight.
| Main task | Total | Numbers |
|---|---|---|
| Calculation and number patterns | 19 | 1–7, 9, 12, 16–19, 21–22, 28–29, 33–34 |
| Word tasks | 8 | 8, 11, 14, 25–27, 37–38 |
| Codes and invented language | 2 | 10, 15 |
| Deduction and relationships | 5 | 20, 23–24, 39–40 |
| Word and character counting | 3 | 13, 35–36 |
| Spatial folding | 3 | 30–32 |
The chart summarises 40 classified questions. The task types and exact question numbers are in the table.
How long does each part last?
The first part allows 1,500 seconds for 40 questions: an average of 37.5 seconds each. The second allows 420 seconds for 50 comparisons: 8.4 seconds each. These are arithmetic averages of each part’s allotted time, not a recommended limit for every question.
The two parts contain 32 timed minutes in total. Averaging that total over all 90 questions hides their different demands. Practise them separately before rehearsing the full sequence; spare time in one part should not be treated as extra time in the other.
What to practise from this paper
Use the distribution to choose relevant practice, then adjust your plan to the mistakes you actually make. More items in a category do not establish greater difficulty or greater value in the final score.
- Build a mixed set with calculation, word tasks, deduction and folding. Review both the answer and the interpretation of the question.
- For comparison practice, move position by position and include changes of case and similar-looking letters. Start accurately before adding a timer.
- After an archived attempt, separate method errors, reading errors and items left unfinished. Recheck a new example of the same type instead of memorising its answer.
An original practice example
This new example follows the app’s positional-comparison rule. It is not a question copied from the archived paper. Compare the two strings exactly, including letter case.
Scores and answer-key cautions
Base 6.1.3.c of the 2021 call gives the following correction formula.
- A
- Correct answers
- E
- Incorrect answers
- n
- Answer options per question
- P
- Total number of questions
The archived copy’s first part offers four choices. Its second-part instructions mention three alternatives but then define A–D; Cognik’s reviewed task offers counts 0–3. This inconsistency should not be silently turned into a historical scoring rule.
The copy’s printed key for question 24 differs from our reviewed answer. That is an editorial correction, not evidence of a tribunal annulment. Historical weighting and annulments have not been verified; Cognik labels its assessment estimate accordingly. Do not infer an official pass result from question counts or a practice score.
Sources and current exam information
The counts above come from the archived edition and our item-by-item classification. The BOE link supports the historical call and its formula, not this editorial distribution. For the format of a current entrance process, read its own call and the current Policía Nacional guide.
Put it into practice
Explore more questions and step-by-step explanations in Cognik.